Master thesis evaluation criteria

Master thesis evaluation criteria

Master's Thesis Evaluation Standards Part 1: Minimum thesis requirements that must be met at the defense time. Successfully defending a thesis requires that the student has obtained sufficient data to make a significant contribution to a research paper that will be published in a peer-reviewed journal Aspect Criteria for evaluation 1. Scope of thesis points 1. Relatively limited scope. 2. Requires knowledge of a number of themes. 3. Comprises several themes and shows author’s ability to compare and prioritize them. 2. Challenge points 1. Basic studies provide sufficient theoretical background for the thesis. 2. Apart from the above, requires ability to apply the latest knowledge and methods of the The thesis should be written in Japanese or English about the research that the master degree candidate conducted independently. The thesis will be evaluated based on the diploma policies of the graduate school, and the program and laboratory that the candidate belongs to and the following criteria. A title clearly identifies the topic of the thesis

Thesis evaluation criteria

The general assessment criteria cover the following issues:. The theoretical background is quite narrow, one-sided and unstructured. There is a lot to remark on the thesis on all levels, with deficiencies and obvious errors. The presentation of the research results is superficial, summarizing and enumerative. The discussion does not reach the level of independent interpretation. The whole is rather weak and unfinished. The theoretical background is loosely connected with the research problems, and the use of empiry is mechanical and deficient.

There is a lot of good in the thesis, but also major shortcomings. The use of research methods is formalistic and unstructured. There are errors in the analysis, and the language and form of the thesis also have major flaws. Although discussion as a whole is quite scanty, it does include pointers to possible applications. The data has been processed well and almost faultlessly.

There can be some uncertainty in some central part of the thesis. The results are clearly consistent with the goals set for the study. The language and form of the thesis is master thesis evaluation criteria and consistent. The results have been interpreted consistently and at a high quality. The student is in control of scientific publication practices, appearance and language of the thesis and ethical discussion. The thesis is very clear in structure and shows a highly advanced knowledge of the discipline of science.

The theoretical background is meritorious and diversified and has a high quality. The connection between theory and empiry is very strong.

The methodological analyses have a high quality, they are independent and well justified. The use of sources is selective, plentiful and critical. The concepts have been defined well, master thesis evaluation criteria, and they have been used correctly and clearly.

The research data matches the study purposes. The data has been well classified and analyzed, master thesis evaluation criteria, creatively and without any faults. The main results have been gathered exceptionally well, and they have been assessed critically. The thesis shows an independent grasp and it follows good scientific practices, master thesis evaluation criteria.

The thesis includes lots of new observations. As a whole, the thesis is stylistically excellent and consistent. Skip to main content. Close search. Faculty of Education. Admissions Available programmes Application Master's programmes and other special admissions Studying Education Programmes Education Primary Teacher Education Music Education Early Childhood Education Edglo - Master's Degree master thesis evaluation criteria in Education and Globalisation Subject Teacher Education Special Education Studies Study guide Timetables Examinations Recognition of Prior Learning RPL Practices Intercultural Teacher Education Theses Graduation Minor subject studies Learning and Master thesis evaluation criteria Technology Research Unit LET Women's and Gender Studies Sociology and Environmental Education Summer Studies Forms Passive Register Doctoral Programme Faculty Activities Organisation structure Faculty Board Management Group Education Committee Equality.

Assessment Criteria for Master's Theses.

How do you read a thesis?

, time: 9:19

Master's Thesis Evaluation Standards

Mar 21,  · The thesis should be no longer than necessary. Assessment CriteriaIntegration & Coherence• There should be logical & rational links between the component parts of the thesis.• There should be an intellectual WHOLENESS to the thesis. Assessment CriteriaContribution to Knowledge (Masters)• Independent research based on sound knowledge.• The master’s thesis is a carefully argued scholarly paper of approximately 12, – 13, words (roughly 50 pages). It should present an original argument that is carefully documented from primary and/or secondary sources. The thesis must have a substantial research component and a focus that falls within arts and science, and it must be written under the guidance of an blogger.com Size: 99KB Master's Thesis Evaluation Standards Part 1: Minimum thesis requirements that must be met at the defense time. Successfully defending a thesis requires that the student has obtained sufficient data to make a significant contribution to a research paper that will be published in a peer-reviewed journal